According to The State, Graham is brushing off the gains from his competitor as a result of “skewed polls and millions of liberal dollars from California,” but reports show that Graham’s favor within the state of South Carolina has, in fact, dipped. In a deep-red state, the shift is major, and it comes on the heels of a Quinnipiac poll released this month that had Harrison and Graham tied at 44 percent. On Monday, The Cook Political Report shifted its Senate race projection for the state of South Carolina from “likely Republican” to “lean Republican.” Unprecedented financial support for opponent Jaime Harrison was likely a first sign, but now a new poll is making that decidedly more clear. If Graham thinks that is “offensive” and “absurd,” he should rethink what those words actually mean.Lindsey Graham has served 17 years in the Senate, but it appears his seat in Congress is in trouble. ![]() The vast majority of Republican senators have already settled on the this -is-unconstitutional! argument to allow them to avoid engaging with the actual facts of Trump’s months-long effort to raise questions about the election and rally his most ardent supporters to fight the results.īut for Graham to contend that what the Senate (and the rest of us) have seen over the last two days is somehow going to mean that fewer senators vote to convict Trump is a) not factually accurate and b) appalling.Īny thinking person who has watched the impeachment managers’ case over the last two days has come away with one very clear insight: The January 6 riots were really bad and, if not for a few heroes like Capitol Police officer Eugene Goodman, could have been much, much worse. Which supports the overarching reality of this trial: There just aren’t many senators who are genuinely undecided. (A supermajority - 67 senators - would need to vote for Trump’s conviction, which seems very unlikely.) Tim Scott (R) predicted Wednesday tha t “probably five and maybe six” Republican senators would cross party lines and eventually vote to convict and remove Trump from office. … As an impartial juror, I’m going to vote for the side that did the good job.” … One side is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job. “President Trump’s team, they were disorganized. “The House managers were focused, they were organized … they made a compelling argument,” explained Cassidy. That what had been presented so far makes more Republican senators likely to vote with the former President in the final reckoning.Īll available evidence of the trial to this point disputes that contention.Īfter a test vote last month on the constitutionality of the trial garnered just five Republican votes, a similar vote on the trial’s first day drew six Republicans. He specifically says that the managers’ presentation is moving votes away from convicting Trump and toward acquitting him. Johnson, for example, is virtually certain to vote to acquit Trump - no matter how much he was affected by the impeachment managers’ presentations.īut that’s not what Graham is talking about in his tweet. Now there is obviously a difference between being disturbed by what happened at the Capitol on January 6 and being willing to vote to convict Trump for his role in inciting that melee. Ron Johnson, asked whether he was shaken by the footage of the riot shown Wednesday, responded: “Who wouldn’t be?” “The evidence that has been presented is pretty damning.” Wisconsin Sen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |